BACKGROUND
1) Tom Nicholsm “The Trump Team’s Denials Are Laughable; The president’s officials must know that what they did in the Signal group chat was wrong—and dangerous,” The Atlantic, March 26, 2025 (3:26 pm);
2) Jeffrey Goldberg and Shane Harris, “Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signalb; The administration has downplayed the importance of the text messages inadvertently sent to The Atlantic’s editor in chief., The Atlanric, March 26, 2025 (8:19 am);
Malevolent incompetenxe
Donald Trumpmon his first day in office issued a decree which granted tge highestvsecurity clearance to anyone je ne named or the White House Counsel added yo the list, without any vetting. Elon Musk and his ream, and pro-Russian Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, as well as Defense Secretary Pail Hegsith presumably received such clearances without vetting. Vetting mihhybhave identified Hegseth drinking oroblems and Gabbard” pro-Russian and pro-Syrian actions and statements as problematical. Musk represents a huge security risk because of his investments and Tesla operations in China.
The biggest security risk, of course, is Donald Trump whois reliably reported to beca Russian asset.
The mind+boggling incompetence of Paul Hefseth and others who participated in the Signal chat hours before U.S. mikitarybaction against targets in Temen is malevolentmp because Trump demonstrably incompetent people like Hegseth abd Gabbard to key National Security positions with suchbdisregard forvqualifications as to amount to malice.
Now we must demand truthful ansers to the following question:
“What other chats on Signal ot other unsecured platforms did tgese and other national security officials engage in?